Qualitative Research Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Qualitative Research - Essay ExampleThe mind why qualitative enquiry method is utilise is because of its ease of use over quantitate investigate method. For instance, measuring human emotions through quantitative search would be very difficult. However there are tools in stock(predicate) in qualitative research method where people push aside even incorporate human emotions and feelings in their analysis. When using qualitative research methodology, the conclusion of the study is a mere proposition, an informed assertion. There is no hence proved at the end of the study. This is where quantitative study comes in. If the proposition deduced by qualitative research needs to be proven or at least get a more concrete support, the proposition can be analysed/qualified with quantitative research. Empirical support can be used from quantitative method to support qualitative conclusion. However this approach is discredited by Oxford University professor curing Flyvbjerg. According to F lyvbjerg, qualitative research methodology can be used, both for hypotheses testing and going beyond the limit of generalizing limited case studies (Flyvbjerg, 2006). Strengths of Qualitative Research Here are some of the strengths of qualitative research a) Data is based on participants own meanings and interpretations b) In-depth study becomes relatively easy in qualitative research however the number of cases cant be too large c) When complex phenomena are cosmos studied it is helpful to use qualitative method d) It provides information on individual cases e) Can handle cross-case comparisons and analysis f) It provides an understanding of personal experiences of people. g) It can describe the phenomena in rich detail as it embosses in local context. h) The examiner can study active processes, for instance documenting sequential patterns and alterations. i) The examiner almost everlastingly classifies contextual and setting factors as they link with the portent of interest. j) Primarily qualitative method of grounded opening can be used by the investigator to generate a cautious but elaborate theory about the phenomenon under study (Johnson & Christensen, 2000). 2. Interpretivism Interpretivism is a concept in sociology that the method of investigation applied to the native world may not be applicable to the social realm. In other words, scientists and investigators must toss empirical evidence and scientific method social research. This aspect of interpretivism is also called Anti-positivism, which holds that scientists need to focus on the interpretations of social sciences in understanding the people being studied (Gerber, John J. Macionis, Linda M., 2011). Interpretivism is a term that has twain contexts i.e. legal and social. In the philosophy of law, Interpretivism is a school of thought which claims that a) Law and morality do create their differences but they cannot be separated. b) Law is not inherent in nature and legal values cannot outl ive without legal practice. c) Law is not a given set of conventions and data (Wikipedia Contributors, 2012). In social sciences, Interpretivism or Anti-positivism is a view which claims that social realm may not be subject to the investigative methods of immanent world. It proposes that in order to conduct social research, researchers must abandon the scientific method and focus on the personal interpretation of social actions of the people under study. In today